Zack Snyder Says Sequel to His Most Critically Panned Project Could Still Happen: “We’ll See”

Netflix just dropped a new video game called “Blood Line,” which is based on Zack Snyder’s “Rebel Moon” movies. The game is made by Super Evil Megacorp, the same studio behind “Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles: Splintered Fate” and “Vainglory.”

In “Blood Line,” players can team up online and play as rebels fighting against the evil Motherworld. Right now, the game is only available for Netflix subscribers, and you can get it for free through the Netflix app.

As for the future of the “Rebel Moon” movies, Zack Snyder isn’t sure what’s next. He told Variety that he’s focusing on another project right now. “I got sidetracked into this — not sidetracked, it’s all uptown problems, as they say — for Netflix, I’m working on an LAPD SWAT movie,” Snyder explained.

He added that after finishing both “Rebel Moon” films together, he needed a break. “It was nice to have a bit of a break from it. I love it like crazy, but it’s nice to have a bit of a break. So yeah, we’ll see after I finish this, when I come back, where we are with everything.”

Snyder didn’t confirm if more “Rebel Moon” movies will be made, but he said there are many stories left to tell. “There’s tons of stories. So, I mean, I think it’s literally, it’s endless. But, again, like I say, I’m waiting to see how we want to and in what way we would move forward, if at all.”

During the interview, Snyder also mentioned that he hadn’t yet seen James Gunn’s new “Superman” movie, which came out on July 11. He said he plans to watch it soon. “This weekend I don’t think I’m seeing it because I have a horse show — my kids ride horses — but I’m going to try to see it right after that,” Snyder said.

On the critical side, things aren’t looking great for “Rebel Moon.” According to Rotten Tomatoes, only 16% of critics gave the latest film, “The Scargiver,” a positive review.

Metacritic scored it 35 out of 100, which means most reviews weren’t favorable. Some critics called it boring and messy. RogerEbert.com said it felt “as anemic and negligible as the non-s****** scenes in a floppy, overproduced p****.” Others, like the San Francisco Chronicle, thought the final battle scenes were good, but not enough to save the movie.

Have something to add? Let us know in the comments below!