10 Ways The ‘Jurassic World’ Trilogy Aged Poorly

The ‘Jurassic World’ trilogy kicked off with a bang in 2015, bringing dinosaurs back to the big screen with fresh energy. Fans were thrilled to see a new take on the beloved ‘Jurassic Park’ legacy, but as the years have passed, the trilogy’s shine has dulled, revealing flaws that make it feel dated.

From shaky storytelling to outdated visuals, the trilogy struggles to hold up against modern expectations. Below, I dive into ten ways the ‘Jurassic World’ films have aged poorly, exploring what went wrong and why these movies don’t quite roar like they used to.

Overreliance on CGI in ‘Jurassic World’ (2015)

The first film leaned heavily on computer-generated imagery, which felt cutting-edge at the time but now looks overly polished. Unlike the original ‘Jurassic Park’ (1993), which mixed practical effects with CGI for a grounded feel, the dinosaurs here often seem like slick video game characters.

This choice strips away the raw, tactile quality that made the originals so gripping. Watching it today, the visuals feel more like a theme park ride than a believable world, making the stakes feel less real.

Weak Character Development in ‘Jurassic World’ (2015)

Characters like Owen Grady and Claire Dearing start off promising but end up as flat archetypes. Their arcs feel forced, with little depth beyond action-hero quips and predictable romance.

This lack of growth makes it hard to care about their journey. Modern audiences crave richer characters, and the film’s thin personalities stand out as a missed opportunity compared to the memorable cast of the original trilogy.

Unconvincing Science in ‘Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom’ (2018)

The sequel introduced genetically engineered dinosaurs like the Indoraptor, pushing the science into cartoonish territory. The idea of splicing DNA with modern animals feels more like sci-fi fantasy than the plausible genetics of earlier films.

Today, with more awareness of genetic engineering, these plot points seem silly and detached from reality. It breaks the immersive realism that made the franchise special.

Pacing Issues in ‘Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom’ (2018)

The film’s story jumps from volcanic eruptions to mansion conspiracies, leaving little room for tension to build. Scenes feel rushed, with action sequences overshadowing quieter moments that could have added depth.

This uneven pacing feels chaotic now, especially when compared to tightly crafted blockbusters. The lack of balance makes the movie feel more like a checklist of events than a cohesive story.

Dated Gender Dynamics in ‘Jurassic World’ (2015)

Claire’s arc, from uptight executive to action heroine, relies on outdated stereotypes. Her transformation feels tied to shedding femininity for toughness, which doesn’t sit well with modern views on gender roles.

This approach feels out of touch today, as audiences expect more nuanced portrayals. It’s a stark contrast to the stronger, more balanced characters in recent films.

Overblown Villains in ‘Jurassic World: Dominion’ (2022)

The final film’s villains, like the cartoonish CEO Lewis Dodgson, feel like caricatures of corporate greed. Their exaggerated motives lack the subtlety of earlier antagonists like John Hammond, who had complex intentions.

In an era of more grounded storytelling, these over-the-top baddies feel like relics of a less sophisticated blockbuster age, reducing the film’s emotional weight.

Lack of Awe in ‘Jurassic World: Dominion’ (2022)

The original ‘Jurassic Park’ captured wonder with moments like the Brachiosaurus reveal. ‘Dominion’ tries to recreate this but often falls flat, with dinosaurs feeling more like set pieces than majestic creatures.

This loss of awe makes the film feel hollow. Modern viewers, used to breathtaking visuals in other franchises, notice the absence of that magical spark.

Repetitive Themes Across the Trilogy (2015-2022)

The trilogy keeps hammering on the same ideas—corporate greed, playing god—without adding fresh angles. What felt bold in 2015 became stale by 2022, as the films failed to evolve the franchise’s core messages.

Audiences now expect franchises to grow thematically. The lack of new ideas makes the trilogy feel like it’s stuck in the past, recycling old warnings.

Underused Legacy Characters in ‘Jurassic World: Dominion’ (2022)

Bringing back Alan Grant, Ellie Sattler, and Ian Malcolm was a fan-pleasing move, but their roles feel like cameos. They’re sidelined in favor of new characters, wasting their potential to tie the trilogy to its roots.

This choice feels like a missed opportunity today, as fans wanted deeper connections to the original films. It leaves the movie feeling disconnected from the legacy it promised to honor.

Inconsistent Tone Across the Trilogy (2015-2022)

The trilogy swings between action, horror, and family adventure without finding a clear identity. ‘Jurassic World’ feels like a theme park romp, while ‘Fallen Kingdom’ leans into gothic horror, and ‘Dominion’ tries to be an epic finale.

This inconsistency feels jarring now, as modern blockbusters aim for a cohesive tone. The trilogy’s shifting vibes make it hard to view as a unified story.

Which ‘Jurassic World’ flaw bothers you the most, or did I miss something that stands out? Drop your thoughts in the comments!