Chris Hansen Calls A24’s ‘Primetime’ an “Insult” as His Real-Life Story Sparks a New Hollywood Fight
Chris Hansen has finally seen enough of Primetime, and he is not impressed with what he saw. The A24 film, directed by Lance Oppenheim and starring Robert Pattinson in a fictionalized version of Hansen, has already become one of the more talked-about movies coming out of the Venice Film Festival. Pattinson has picked up early awards attention for his performance, but the real person behind the story has made it clear that he wants nothing to do with the movie.
In a new interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Hansen strongly criticized the film and called it an “insult.” The interview took place in Chicago while Hansen was attending a conference for the National Center for Victims of Crime. He explained that he had originally planned to wait until he watched the movie before deciding what he thought, but his feelings changed after seeing more of the project and its trailer.
Hansen’s biggest problem is that he says the filmmakers never contacted him while making the movie. From his point of view, that means the production was never seriously interested in hearing his side of the story. He believes his time working on To Catch a Predator already contains enough drama without Hollywood adding fictional material to make the story darker or more shocking.
The film looks at the period when Hansen became famous for his work confronting people who believed they were communicating with underage children online. His television investigations became a major part of the true-crime world, but they also created serious controversy. Primetime focuses heavily on one of the most painful moments connected to that period, making the 2006 death of Texas prosecutor Bill Conradt a major part of its story.
Conradt died by suicide when police arrived at his home as part of a sting connected to Hansen’s program. The incident became one of the biggest controversies surrounding To Catch a Predator and eventually contributed to the end of the series. NBC also faced a lawsuit connected to the case, with the network later settling for an undisclosed amount. The subject remains highly sensitive, especially because the film places it near the center of its dramatic story.
Hansen, however, says he does not regret the work he did. Speaking to The Hollywood Reporter, he defended the larger purpose of his investigations and argued that the good that came from exposing predators should not be forgotten because of the controversy surrounding one case. His comments show that he still strongly believes in the methods and mission that made him a controversial figure in the first place.

His frustration with Primetime has also moved beyond interviews. Hansen reportedly chose not to attend a screening after being asked to sign paperwork connected to the event. Instead, he found another way to put himself directly in front of the movie’s audience. He purchased advertising that will reportedly appear before screenings of Primetime during at least the first four weeks of its theatrical run. The ads promote TruBlu, his own true-crime streaming platform.
Shawn Rech, president of TruBlu, described the advertising move as an opportunity to reach moviegoers who already know Hansen’s name. It also adds another strange layer to the story, because audiences heading to theaters to watch a fictionalized version of Hansen’s career may see the real Hansen promoting his own work before the film even begins.
The reaction from Hansen is especially interesting because Primetime has received a much warmer response from critics. The movie currently has a strong Rotten Tomatoes score following its Venice premiere, while Pattinson’s performance has generated early awards talk. That creates a clear divide between the way critics are viewing the film and the way Hansen sees it.
For now, both sides appear to be moving in completely different directions. A24 is preparing for the movie’s wider theatrical release on September 25, while Hansen continues to challenge the way his life and career have been presented on screen. Whether the controversy makes more people curious about Primetime or turns audiences away is something that will become clearer once the movie reaches theaters.
What makes the situation even more unusual is that Hansen is not simply criticizing the film from a distance. He is actively putting his own name and version of the story in front of the same audience that the movie is trying to reach. Primetime may be Hollywood’s interpretation of Chris Hansen, but the real Hansen clearly intends to have the final word about his legacy.
Will Chris Hansen’s criticism make you more interested in watching Primetime?
Have something to add? Let us know in the comments.

