Is ‘House of Dynamite’ Based on True Events? Fact vs. Fiction and Sequel Speculation
A House of Dynamite is a 2025 American apocalyptic political thriller directed by Kathryn Bigelow and written by Noah Oppenheim.
The film stars Idris Elba, Rebecca Ferguson, Gabriel Basso, Jared Harris, Tracy Letts, Anthony Ramos, Moses Ingram, Jonah Hauer-King, Greta Lee, and Jason Clarke. It tells the story of the U.S. government scrambling to respond after a single nuclear missile is launched by an unknown enemy.
In the film, Captain Olivia Walker takes over the watch in the White House Situation Room early one morning.
The team is briefed on rising tensions in Iran, North Korea’s unusual silence, and a supposed military exercise by China. Suddenly, radar detects an unidentified intercontinental ballistic missile heading toward the Chicago area with only twenty minutes before impact. What follows is a tense, high-stakes depiction of a nuclear crisis unfolding in real time.
BREAKING: The Trailer for Kathryn Bigelow’s A House of Dynamite Just Dropped
— Cinema Tweets (@CinemaTweets1) September 3, 2025
Tell Me Your Immediate Thoughts pic.twitter.com/qZDhPhq2Ho
While the story is fictional, several aspects of the film are grounded in reality.
The U.S. does have a missile defense system, including interceptors at Fort Greely in Alaska. These systems could theoretically attempt to shoot down an incoming missile, though failure is possible, just like in the movie. The “nuclear football,” a briefcase carrying nuclear launch codes, is also real and always travels with the president.
Nuclear expert Matthew Bunn from the Harvard Kennedy School told NPR that while a surprise attack is technically possible, it is highly unlikely. Most nuclear conflicts would start as an escalation from a larger crisis rather than a single missile strike.
Screenwriter Noah Oppenheim, who also worked on Netflix’s Zero Day, drew from his extensive experience and interviews with government officials to make the film feel authentic.
In an email interview with Decider, Oppenheim said, “There are two questions: Does the incoming ICBM detonate and does POTUS respond? I do have answers in my head to both, but it’s not relevant to the issues we’re trying to raise… Should one person have the power to decide the fate of all mankind, with little preparation and only minutes to decide, while simultaneously running for his (or her) life? That should already be terrifying enough.”
Oppenheim emphasized that the film is meant to spark conversation about nuclear weapons and decision-making rather than present a definitive scenario. “No matter what final outcome you imagine, you’ve already seen a horror unfold. And in the real world, these weapons and all the processes you’ve just seen are still lurking in the background of our lives. Are we comfortable with that reality or should we do something about it?”
The ending of A House of Dynamite leaves some questions unanswered, which has led fans to speculate about a possible sequel. However, as of now, no follow-up has been officially confirmed.
Overall, the movie blends fiction with realistic details about nuclear defense and government procedure, making its story both thrilling and thought-provoking.
The way the film ends certainly leaves the door open for a continuation, but for now, audiences are left with the tension and consequences of a near-catastrophe.
Have something to add? Let us know in the comments!