5 Reasons Why Gondor Was So Weak in ‘The Lord of the Rings’ Movies

why was gondor so weak

Why trust us? Check out Fiction Horizon’s Editorial Policy.

Share:

The world of Middle-earth, as envisioned by J.R.R. Tolkien, is vast and rich in detail. One such detail that many fans noticed was the portrayal of Gondor in Peter Jackson’s adaptation of “The Lord of the Rings.” While the mighty kingdom was a bastion of hope in Tolkien’s writings, it appeared weakened and on the verge of defeat in the films. Let’s delve into five reasons why this portrayal of Gondor seemed so much more fragile in the movies.

Article breakdown:
+ The tragic fall of Boromir created a significant leadership gap, affecting the morale of Gondor’s troops and their battlefield performance.
+ Faramir’s underrated bravery and unrecognized potential contributed to the challenges faced by Gondor, as he was not effectively utilized or supported.
+ Gondor’s absence of decisive leadership, mainly due to Denethor’s ineffectual rule, led to strategic vulnerabilities during key moments.
+ The film script’s treatment of Gondor often emphasized the kingdom’s weaknesses rather than highlighting its strengths and rich legacy.
+ There is a stark contrast in the portrayal of Gondor’s soldiers between the movies and the books, with the films often diminishing their prowess and valor.

1. The tragedy of Boromir

Boromir

Boromir was more than just a prince; he was Gondor’s symbol of resilience and bravery. Hailing from a lineage of great leaders, he carried the weight of his people’s expectations on his shoulders.

His relationship with the One Ring is a complex one. The Ring’s seductive promise of power ensnared him, reflecting his deep desire to defend his homeland. It wasn’t merely personal greed but a genuine urge to protect Gondor that made him vulnerable to its allure.

In the films, his tragic fall is a poignant reminder of the Ring’s destructive power. This wasn’t just a man being swayed by a piece of jewelry; it was Gondor’s beacon of hope being snuffed out. His eventual redemption, sacrificing himself for the Fellowship, only deepens the tragedy. It’s a bittersweet reminder that even in his last moments, his heart was dedicated to the greater good.

Without Boromir, Gondor was like a rudderless ship in a storm. The loss of such a prominent leader, especially at a crucial time when darkness loomed, significantly weakened Gondor’s spirit. In essence, Boromir’s tragedy was a profound blow not just to him but to the entire land he so dearly loved.

RELATED:

What Is the White Tree of NĂșmenor, & How Is It Related to the White Tree of Gondor

2. Faramir’s underrated bravery

Faramir

Ah, Faramir! Whenever I reflect on the characters of Middle-earth, Faramir stands out as one of its most unsung heroes. Where Boromir was the fiery embodiment of Gondor’s pride, Faramir was its quiet, enduring spirit. While both brothers loved their homeland deeply, their ways of expressing it were worlds apart.

In my opinion, the movies did a slight disservice to Faramir’s character. In Tolkien’s writings, he showcased a rare resistance to the Ring, a strength not even his elder brother could muster. His decision to let Frodo and Sam continue their quest was a powerful testament to his wisdom and understanding of the bigger picture.

Yet, in the films, his character seemed overshadowed, his bravery and wisdom often going unnoticed amidst the larger-than-life events unfolding around him. It pained me to see this gentle-hearted warrior, who was as noble as Aragorn and as wise as Gandalf, not receiving the recognition he truly deserved.

The bond with his father, Denethor, added another layer to his tragedy. Yearning for approval that rarely came, Faramir faced battles on two fronts: against Mordor’s encroaching shadow and within Minas Tirith’s walls, trying to prove his worth to a father blinded by grief and despair.

Faramir’s courage wasn’t the boisterous kind, demanding attention. It was the silent strength that kept Gondor’s flames of hope alive. Through his underrated bravery, Faramir taught many of us that heroism isn’t always about grand gestures; sometimes, the quiet decisions made in the shadows truly define a hero.

3. The absence of leadership in Gondor

gondor

Gondor’s grandeur wasn’t merely in its towering walls or its strategic location; it lay in its people and their leaders. During the tumultuous events of “The Lord of the Rings,” this once-mighty kingdom was in a precarious position due to a gaping leadership void.

One can’t help but feel a pang of sorrow for Gondor when reflecting on the character of Denethor, the ruling Steward. His descent into despair and madness, exacerbated by the loss of Boromir, created an atmosphere of uncertainty and gloom in Minas Tirith. Where once the Stewards were steadfast leaders, Denethor’s reign became emblematic of Gondor’s waning strength.

Witnessing Denethor’s fall felt like watching an old friend lose their way. It served as a somber reminder of how critical effective leadership is, especially in times of crisis. Gondor’s strength was its unity, and without a strong hand to guide it, the kingdom became fragmented and vulnerable.

RELATED:

Why Didn’t the Elves and the Dwarves Help Gondor?

Yet, even in these times, there were sparks of hope. Faramir, while not officially the leader, showcased the qualities of a true leader: wisdom, bravery, and an unwavering commitment to his people. It’s a testament to Gondor’s resilience that even in the face of waning leadership, individuals like Faramir stepped up to guide the kingdom towards a brighter future.

In essence, Gondor’s leadership vacuum exposed the kingdom’s vulnerabilities and highlighted its people’s indomitable spirit. For even in the absence of a king, Gondor’s heart continued to beat, waiting for the day a true leader would reclaim the throne.

4. The script’s treatment of Gondor

Why was Gondor so weak in the Lord of the Rings Movies?

While Peter Jackson’s cinematic adaptation of “The Lord of the Rings” is a masterpiece in many respects, its depiction of Gondor always stirred mixed emotions in me.

The films had the daunting task of condensing a vast, rich tapestry of Middle-earth lore into digestible chunks for moviegoers. In doing so, Gondor’s portrayal seemed somewhat diminished compared to its depiction in Tolkien’s novels.

In the books, Gondor is an ancient, majestic kingdom filled with history and legacy. It stands as the last great bastion against the forces of darkness. Yet, in the movies, the land and its warriors often appear as mere shadows of their literary counterparts. The might and resilience of Gondor felt somewhat muted, a necessary sacrifice, perhaps, to heighten the stakes and amplify the drama.

It’s akin to hearing a tale of a great lion, only to be introduced to its subdued, cinematic version. The essence is there, but some of its roaring spirit seems lost. The script chose to amplify the direness of the situation, making Gondor appear more beleaguered and fragile, perhaps to make the eventual victory feel even more triumphant.

Despite this, one cannot deny the visual spectacle and emotion the films deliver. But for those of us intimate with Tolkien’s vision, we’re left yearning for a Gondor more reminiscent of the literary giant it truly was. In the grand scheme of the trilogy, the script’s choices are understandable. But oh, how my heart aches for the full glory of Gondor to have graced our screens!

5. Contrasting power: Gondor’s Soldiers in the movies vs. books

Gondor's Soldiers

The dichotomy between how Gondor’s soldiers are portrayed in Tolkien’s books versus their depiction in the movies always struck a chord with me. It’s like hearing two different renditions of the same song, each with its unique flavor yet stemming from the same source.

In Tolkien’s meticulous narrative, Gondor’s soldiers are valiant disciplined, and represent the last, sturdy line of defense against the encroaching darkness. Their bravery isn’t just in their battle skills but also in their unwavering spirit. Throughout the pages, one feels the weight of their legacy, the centuries of battles they’ve fought, and the pride they carry as the defenders of the free people of Middle-earth.

However, in Peter Jackson’s adaptation, the soldiers often come across as less formidable. Their capability seems diminished, almost as if they’re constantly on the back foot, struggling against Sauron’s forces. While this choice undeniably ramps up the tension and drama of the cinematic experience, it also somewhat robs Gondor’s soldiers of their literary prowess.

I’ve always imagined Gondor’s soldiers, based on the books, as steadfast warriors, each carrying the legacy of the DĂșnedain, with a spirit as unbreakable as the walls of Minas Tirith. While offering a visual feast, the movies sometimes made them appear more as pawns in a larger game, often overshadowed by the heroics of the main characters.

In essence, the soldiers of Gondor in the books are towers of strength, carrying hope in every shield, every sword swing. For the sake of narrative tension, the films paint a slightly different picture. Both versions have their merits, but the contrast is hard to miss for those who’ve walked the pages of Middle-earth. It serves as a reminder of the vastness of Tolkien’s world and the challenges in adapting such depth into film.

Still, in my heart, Gondor’s soldiers remain the unsung heroes, standing tall against the tide of darkness.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments